|
Knock My Socks Off by Barbara Sachs Sloan
How can you get an editor, agent or
publisher to pull your manuscript out of the
slush pile and select it as THE one to print?
Write well.
Sound simple? Well, maybe it is.
For starters, editors/agents/publishers see
SO many manuscripts so often, e/a/p's have
developed a set of pet peeves. Are these a matter
of "taste"? No. They're the result of
seeing the SAME "mistakes" so many
times, the e/a/p feels like flogging the next
writer who makes them. Or just not reading that
manuscript, and back into the slush pile or into
its return envelope it goes.
Here are a few of those
"mistakes":
1. "This is a rough draft"
scribbled on a submission (includes the
"I'll be happy to change/fix it any way you
want" disclaimer). Take the pains to get it
right, tight and focused before you submit it.
2. Starting the cover letter with
"I." Believe me, the e/a/p will be
happy to get to know you IF your manuscript
passes muster. But what the e/a/p really wants to
know about right away is the subject of the
story/article. Focus on your subject matter and
on hooking the editor with the aspect of it that
perhaps hooked you.
3. Unprofessional appearance: improper
format, messy pages, light type, large or very
small or unusual fonts, ALL CAPS (except for the
manuscript's title), sloppy spelling and grammar,
typos.
4. Unprofessional writing: "as"
clauses everywhere (Three in ONE paragraph is
THREE too many), contrived-sounding dialogue tags
("Why is that?" he questioned.), clunky
dialogue (not using contractions when nobody is
speaking "formally" and "talking
to the reader" by putting narrative details
into the dialogue), really long sentences packed
with independent and dependent clauses and
prepositional phrases.
5. Poor organization: Don't plug in details
as they occur to you--put them where they belong
according to the logic of timing and sequence (or
move them on rewrite); don't just start writing
and let the words tumble out, and then SUBMIT
that draft. But worrying about organization ruins
creativity, right? Wrong. Don't WORRY about
organization--let your words tumble if you must
(if that's what does work for you creatively) for
the first draft; then review and organize and
tighten.
6. Repetition: Why is it that a word comes
to us for use several times in a row? Part of the
"craft of writing" is then going back
through and cleaning those up, using different
words instead of repeating the same ones three
times in two sentences.
7. Not understanding the rules. I don't
know how the e/a/p's can tell, but we can spot
the difference immediately between someone who
knows the rules and is artfully breaking them and
someone who is breaking rules he doesn't know
anything about.
8. Clumsy writing: the word
"that" sprinkled liberally throughout;
misuse of words, including simple ones such as
"when" and "once" (In order
to avoid "as," writers switch to
"when" but forget the logic involved in
what can happen exactly in concert with a
"when"); misuse specifically of
progressive tense verbs (Remember, when you use
phrases such as "Grabbing his coat and
putting it on, he buttoned it quickly," you
are making a person do things simultaneously that
can't be done all at the same time--follow the
logic of the actions).
9. However, this leads to the mistake, in
fiction particularly, of following the actions of
the character too much. It isn't necessary to
track every move and gesture (He went into the
room, walked over to the window, etc., THEN left
the room, got into his car, shut the door ...
zzzzzz) unless such action in the rare scene is
showing something vital about the character. The
customary method for handling character movement
is to "collapse time" and have the
character already in the next place you need him
to be.
10. Chunking: putting all your situational
details in big chunks of dialogue and/or
narrative in places where these big chunks stop
the ongoing action. If you need to put in a block
of information, wait until the critical action
reaches a natural pause spot.
11. The SAME story ideas over and over and
over and over, with writers not bothering to read
what's being published or to make their stories
have that sufficiently-different slant needed to
make yet one more story on this overdone topic
actually worth reading let alone publishing.
12. Making "typical beginner's
mistakes": wordy, unclear, inconsistent
writing/story lines full of holes or
contradictions, dialogue that sounds fake, a
voice that's too formal for the situation, words
and images that contradict the mood, too many
dialogue tags filled with adverbs, too much
detail that actually has nothing to do with the
subject or with advancing the story.
E/a/p's want your manuscript to knock their
socks off, they really do. So give them what they
want :)
|
|